- Knowledge Base
- TAO Terminology Explained Part 3: Scoring Assessments
- The Processing Part of Scoring Assessments
-
TAO Portal Quickstart Guide
-
Rostering in TAO Portal
-
Creating assessment materials in TAO
-
Creating assessments for delivery in TAO
-
Proctoring in TAO Portal
-
Viewing results in TAO Portal
-
How Does Scoring Work in TAO?
-
Writing Your Own Scoring Rules for Your Assessments: An Example
-
TAO Portal Terminology
-
TAO Quickstart Guide
-
Making the Most of the Asset Manager
-
Working With Metadata in TAO
-
Configuring Interactions: What Possibilities do You Have?
-
Randomization in Items and Tests
-
All You Need to Know About Test-Takers
-
All About Deliveries
-
Setting up LTI
-
Proctoring Assessments in TAO
-
Interpreting Results Tables in TAO
-
Using the Advanced Search
-
Best Practices for Working with Multiple Users in a Small-scale Authoring Scenario Part 1: Set-up
-
Best Practices for Working with Multiple Users in a Small-scale Authoring Scenario Part 2: Workflow
-
Optimizing Pictures
-
All About Extensions
-
Stylesheets in Assessment Items
-
TAO for RTL Languages
-
TAO Terminology Explained Part 1: TAO Architecture
-
TAO Terminology Explained Part 2: Creating and Delivering Assessments
-
TAO Terminology Explained Part 3: Scoring Assessments
-
Test-taker and Accessibility tools
-
How does scoring work in TAO? (II)
-
Video demos
-
Video tutorials: Creating interactions
-
Thinking About Test Questions (and Choosing Interactions) According to Task Type
Processing of Tests
Now let's consider the processing of entire tests, after the individual items have been scored. This is carried out during Outcome Processing, as described in the lesson with that name in the last chapter.
During Outcome Processing, Melanie’s answers to all of the items in the assessment are processed. This takes place using the Outcome Declarations, which specify, amongst other information, the scoring method to be used, in the form of the Outcome Processing Rules. The values for the (Test) Outcome Variables will be computed using these rules. Again, you can find more information on scoring rules in the User Guide, but for now it is sufficient to say that George has opted for a simple test scoring method for his assessment which tallies the marks of all items to produce a test score. To trigger this method, the name specified in the Outcome Declaration of the Outcome Variable needs to be SCORE_TOTAL.
In terms of Melanie’s test, the item scores from all the items in the ‘Capital Cities‘ assessment will now be used to compute outcomes for the test. These are taken from the (Item) Outcome Variables, which are the variables which carry forward the information from item processing to this next stage: test processing. These contain, for example, the SCORE values for each of the items in the ‘Capital Cities’ test (e.g. the value 0 from Melanie’s incorrect response to the Myanmar question).
Let’s assume that of the ten items in George’s assessment, Melanie answered six of them correctly. The (Test) Outcome Variable would have the value ‘6’, as shown below.
Outcome Variable |
|
Attached to |
Item_1 |
Name |
SCORE_TOTAL |
Interpretation |
Capital of Myanmar |
Value |
6 |
OTHER PROPERTIES |
… |
This information will be presented in the Test Variables (i.e. Test Outcomes) in the results table of the delivery, as shown in the image below. Under the heading Test Variables are outcomes are shown: Melanie Potts answered 6 (Outcome Variable 'SCORE_TOTAL') of the 10 questions in the Capital Cities assessment correctly.
Test (Outcome) Variables
Note: Item Outcomes for each question are shown below the Test Variables, and you'll see that the value of the Response Variable named 'SCORE' for the Myanmar item is '0'.